Re: commit_delay, siblings
От | Hans-Jürgen Schönig |
---|---|
Тема | Re: commit_delay, siblings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42B9A4FD.7030508@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: commit_delay, siblings (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: commit_delay, siblings
Re: commit_delay, siblings |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > >>I've been trying to get a test result for 8.1 that shows that we can eliminate >>commit_delay and commit_siblings, as I believe that these settings no longer >>have any real effect on performance. > > > I don't think they ever did :-(. The theory is good, but useful values > for commit_delay would probably be under a millisecond, and there isn't > any portable way to sleep for such short periods. We've been leaving > them there just in case somebody can find a use for 'em, but I wouldn't > object to taking them out. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) We have done extensive testing some time ago. We could not see any difference on any platform we have tested (AIX, Linux, Solaris). I don't think that there is one at all - at least not on common systems. best regards, hans -- Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria Tel: +43/664/393 39 74 www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: