Re: Proposal - Continue stmt for PL/pgSQL
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal - Continue stmt for PL/pgSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42B1BB24.9030701@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Proposal - Continue stmt for PL/pgSQL (Pavel Stehule <stehule@kix.fsv.cvut.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal - Continue stmt for PL/pgSQL
Re: Proposal - Continue stmt for PL/pgSQL |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule wrote: > >What do you think about it? It's broke PL/SQL compatibility, I know, but >via last discussion I have opinion so Oracle compatibility isn't main >objective PL/pgSQL. There is some less/bigger diferencess: SQLSTATE, >EXCEPTION from my last proposal, atd. > > > > Well, yes, but I don't think we should break compatibility arbitrarilly. I guess it could be argued that this is a missing feature in PL/SQL and its Ada parent - implementing GOTO just to handle this case seems unnecessary. I agree with Tom that it should only be allowed inside a loop. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: