Re: User Quota Implementation
| От | Jonah H. Harris |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: User Quota Implementation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 42AEF83F.40300@tvi.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: User Quota Implementation (Yann Michel <yann-postgresql@spline.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: User Quota Implementation
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
So, are we going to go with 90% or 95% as the assumed assumption for a warning :) Yann Michel wrote: >>I'd like to avoid a GUC for "percent_full_warning" if we can. Can anyone >>see a way around this? Should we just assume 90% full? >> >> > >Well, it was only an idea of not leaving the admin out in the rain but >giving im a hint by time of what might happen if there was no action. I >have absolutely no idea if it is usefull of introducing a new GUC or >setting this value to a fixed size of 90 or whatever percent. Maybe 95 >percent are enough, too? > >Regards, >Yann > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: