Re: Bug with view definition?
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug with view definition? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42A718CF.30608@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug with view definition? (Sebastian Böck <sebastianboeck@freenet.de>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Sebastian Böck wrote: > Richard Huxton wrote: > >> Sebastian Böck wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> why is the last definition of a view not working, although the >>> documentation says all three are equal? >>> >> >> >>> CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW not_working AS >>> SELECT one.* >>> FROM one.one, two.two >>> JOIN join1 ON join1.id = one.id; >> >> >> >> I think it's trying to join "two" to "join1" - try >> ...FROM two.two, one.one >> JOIN join1... > > > Sure, but the problem still exists if you want to join with table one > and table two. Sorry - hadn't read the initial post carefully enough, and didn't see the unconstrained join on one,two. Since "JOIN" has a high precedence you'll want to force the issue with a subselect: SELECT * FROM ( SELECT one.* FROM one.one, two.two ) AS dummy JOIN join1 ON join1.id = dummy.id -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: