Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command
| От | Euler Taveira |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 429f6e0e-31eb-4741-8bf8-e9e827b3076d@www.fastmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021, at 12:57 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> On 17 Aug 2021, at 16:53, Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote:> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021, at 8:06 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:>> ..I think we should reconcile them with>> something like this while in here and fixing things anyways:> I suggest that it should be a message that we already use in another binaries> such as "do not print any output, except for errors".Well, problem is that it’s plain not true. If you pass --quiet --verbose youwill get a lot of output, albeit less than if not using --quiet. Consistencywith other tools is obviously good, but only when it’s correct IMO.
Indeed, it is not a good design. It should be one option --verbose that
increases the verbosity according to a number or an enum value. --verbose=0
means "quiet". However, that ship has sailed.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: