Re: soundex and metaphone
От | Jonah H. Harris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: soundex and metaphone |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4295CA16.2020608@tvi.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: soundex and metaphone (Douglas McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: soundex and metaphone
Re: soundex and metaphone Re: soundex and metaphone Re: soundex and metaphone |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At a minimum I think we should support soundex in the core. I'm willing to move soundex and metaphone into the backend. Does anyone see a reason not to do so? Douglas McNaught wrote: >"Jonah H. Harris" <jharris@tvi.edu> writes: > > > >>Hey everyone, >> >>I've been working with a couple people who didn't know that soundex >>and metaphone were included in the distribution as contrib modules. >>While it's their fault that they didn't check contrib, soundex is >>pretty common among database systems and I was wondering if there was >>a reason it is not included as a core function? >> >> > >Because no one's taken ownership of the code and made a case for >integrating it into the core backend. > >-Doug > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: