Re: Update on tables when the row doesn't change
От | Sebastian Böck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Update on tables when the row doesn't change |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42943BFE.304@freenet.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Update on tables when the row doesn't change (Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Update on tables when the row doesn't change
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Dawid Kuroczko wrote: > On 5/24/05, Sebastian Böck <sebastianboeck@freenet.de> wrote: > >>/* 3rd way of separating updates >> con: unnecessary updates on tables >> pro: view gets evaluated only 1 time >> >> Not adressing the problem of unnecessary updates, but the view >> gets only evaluated one time. >> >>*/ >> >>CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION upd (view_test) RETURNS VOID AS $$ >> DECLARE >> NEW ALIAS FOR $1; >> BEGIN >> RAISE NOTICE 'UPDATE'; >> UPDATE test SET test = NEW.test WHERE id = OLD.id; >> UPDATE join1 SET text1 = NEW.text1 WHERE id = OLD.id; >> UPDATE join2 SET text2 = NEW.text2 WHERE id = OLD.id; >> UPDATE join3 SET text3 = NEW.text3 WHERE id = OLD.id; >> RETURN; >> END; >>$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql; > > > Control question, I didn't check it, but would it be enough to change from: > UPDATE join1 SET text1 = NEW.text1 WHERE id = OLD.id; > to: > UPDATE join1 SET text1 = NEW.text1 WHERE id = OLD.id AND text1 <> NEW.text1? > > ... I may be wrong. :) Yes, thats more elegant then my other (4th) solution. Was late yesterday evening ;) Thanks Sebastian
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: