Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4292.1055273882@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
"Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com> writes: >> From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gearond@cvc.net] >> But others are right. We need someone like IBM is to Linux, >> or Apple is to Konqueror. Someone who puts a lot of time and >> money into the product for their own selfish interests, but >> then releases it. > Isn't Redhat doing that? Red Hat is putting a fair amount of money into PG development: they're paying my salary, for example, and several other people who are not as visible on the lists. But they aren't presently spending a dime on promoting Postgres to the world. *That* is what I miss about Great Bridge; they had the money and the inclination to do marketing efforts. I think the project benefited greatly from the exposure it got from GB's efforts. > I heard they were working on a complete NIST validation. That's a > stupendous effort. We have a couple of college interns going through the NIST validation suite. It'll take a while to finish, but I think it'll be valuable. As someone else pointed out, it's already turned up one previously-unknown (to me anyway) compliance bug. regards, tom lane Red Hat Database project
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: