Re: Postgres in government
От | Ron Mayer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres in government |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 428CED27.9000600@cheapcomplexdevices.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres in government (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres in government
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh Berkus wrote: > Three large Federal agencies I'm not allowed to mention :-( I'm curious why they can't be mentioned? A NDA regarding the technologies used? Classified projects? It seems in many cases even relatively security conscious agencies don't mind vendors announcing their use of open source projects. IBM's Linux/DB2 wins in DHS information sharing networks, and Oracle's Linux/Oracle win on the Department of Homeland Security's own web site come to mind. I'm not doubting you. I know one similar case of a government agency using postgresql, but in this case the reason I can't mentioned it is a matter of one vendor's partnership agreement with another large proprietary database vendor. I'm just curious if the matter was a legal issue with the government or if it was a contractual issue with a vendor.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: