Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 428A97B1.5080203@samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > You can even respond to specific messages within the thread instead of > just a top down (one email after the other). Well, that seems pretty fundamental... >> But the point is that the current system works well; > > Well does it though? I am not saying it is bad, well yes I am ;). There > is no central place for me to point one of my developers and say -- Hey, > look at this patch... weren't we working on something like this? Let's > help them out. I'm not saying there is not room for improvement -- my point is that the fundamental workflow (email submission of patches, discussion and resolution via mailing list discussion) works well, and I don't see any need to change it. If there are tools that help us improve this process (e.g. archiving the resolution of old issues, as you suggest), they are worth considering. In other words, I'd like a tool that fits the way we work now, not one that forces us to change our processes to adapt to its requirements. Anyway, RT sounds like perhaps it is worth investigating. -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: