Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42804669-7063-1320-ed37-3226d5f1067d@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ? (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17.08.23 04:50, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Yeah, this crossed my mind. Do you know of any existing examples of >> options with links to a common section? One problem with this approach is >> that there are small differences in the wording for some of the frontend >> utilities, so it might be difficult to cleanly unite these sections. > The closest thing I can think of is Color Support in section > Appendixes, that describes something shared across a lot of binaries > (that would be 6 tools with this patch). I think it's a bit much to add a whole appendix for that little content. We have a collection of platform-specific notes in chapter 19, including file-system-related notes in section 19.2. Maybe it could be put there?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: