Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ?
От | Raphaël Enrici |
---|---|
Тема | Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 427A7BF2.7030101@club-internet.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ? ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org >>[mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of >>Raphaël Enrici >>Sent: 05 May 2005 20:43 >>To: Andreas Pflug >>Cc: PgAdmin Hackers >>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] which "wx2.6" should we use ? >> >> --with-flavour=pga3 > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > What the heck does that do? something I love! But, let's take a look to the content of the package I'm building for wx2.6: ... /usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3/wx/ ... /usr/bin/wx-config->/usr/lib/wx/config/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3 ... an so on... It helps me not clashing with files provided by other wx packages for my own package :) That's something I learnt from Ron in the end of last year when he was preparing a wx 2.5 release for Debian. Raph.
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: