Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ?
От | Florian G. Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42755EBF.40600@phlo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ? (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ?
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Andreas Pflug wrote: >> wx2.5 is about to be removed from Debian official archive due >> to bugs. It will leave pgadmin3 package in a broken state and >> which would lead to a removal of it too. A transition is on >> the way, Ron explained to me that he would surely upload >> rapidly for wx2.6. I'd like to know if 1.2.0 would compile or >> not and/or if it would be hard to get it build on top of >> wx2.6 instead of 2.5... >> If not, what is the roadmap, if there is one, to a next stable >> release of pga3 based on top of wx2.6 ? > > Some week ago I fixed cvs so 1.2.2 will compile with wx2.6. Seems we > should release 1.2.2 quite soon. Would you be interested in releasing an osx version of 1.2.2 too? If so, I could quite easily backport the build-system changes, and the (very few) actual patches to 1.2. But if you don't want to add a new platform with a minor-version update, I'd safe myself the effort ;-) greetings, Florian Pflug
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: