Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ?
От | Florian G. Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42741278.2030502@phlo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ? (blacknoz@club-internet.fr) |
Ответы |
Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ?
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
blacknoz@club-internet.fr wrote: > wx2.5 is about to be removed from Debian official archive due > to bugs. It will leave pgadmin3 package in a broken state and > which would lead to a removal of it too. A transition is on > the way, Ron explained to me that he would surely upload > rapidly for wx2.6. I'd like to know if 1.2.0 would compile or > not and/or if it would be hard to get it build on top of > wx2.6 instead of 2.5... > If not, what is the roadmap, if there is one, to a next stable > release of pga3 based on top of wx2.6 ? > > All of these questions to help me to take the good decision > concerning pgAdmin III in official Debian. Hi Couldn't you link pgadmin3 statically against wx2.5? The current debian-packages work well (at least for me), and who knows what bugs (be it pgadmin3-bugs or wx-bugs) are revealed by switching wx versions... greetings, Florian Pflug
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: