Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item.
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 426BE832.20904@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item. (Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item.
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Jeff Davis wrote: > Should the text include a mention of synchronous vs. asynchronous? Or > does master-master imply synchronous? It shouldn't. It is possible to have synchronous replication without it being master<->master. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Regards, > Jeff Davis > > On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 08:01 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Robert Treat wrote: >>> >>> >>>>On Sunday 14 November 2004 16:33, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>> >>>>>Log Message: >>>>>----------- >>>>>Remove replicaiton FAQ item. >>>>> >>>>>Modified Files: >>>>>-------------- >>>>> pgsql/doc: >>>>> FAQ (r1.269 -> r1.270) >>>>> >>>>>(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/FAQ.diff?r1=1.269&r2= >>>>>1.270) pgsql/doc/src/FAQ: >>>>> FAQ.html (r1.227 -> r1.228) >>>>> >>>>>(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/FAQ/FAQ.html.diff >>>>>?r1=1.227&r2=1.228) >>>> >>>>While the answer may have been a little dated, this still seems to be an FAQ. >>>>Was there a discussion on removing this? If so I'll go read that, but ISTM >>>>this question should remain. >>> >>>agreed, this definitly does fall under a "Very FAQ" kinda thing ... >>>pointers to the various methods that are currently in use, at a minimum, >>>would be good ... >> >>Yep, big mistake my removing the replication FAQ item. I have re-added a >>new one: >> >> 4.21) What replication solutions are available? >> >> Though "replication" is a single term, there are two major replication >> technologies. Multi-master replication allows read/write queries to be >> sent to multiple replicated computers. Using this capability has a >> serious performance impact. Pgcluster is the most popular such solution >> available for PostgreSQL. Master-slave replication allows a single >> master to receive read/write queries, with slaves able to accept only >> read/SELECT queries. The most popular master-slave PostgreSQL >> replication solution is Slony. There are also commercial and >> hardware-based replication solutions available. >> > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: