Pentium4/Xeon versus AMD
От | P. Joshua Rovero |
---|---|
Тема | Pentium4/Xeon versus AMD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42695685.8050703@sonalysts.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: UltraSPARC versus AMD (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Chris Browne wrote: > Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com writes: > >>I just got done comparing SPECMarks (on spec.org) between Sun's AMD entry >>level servers versus similarly configured UltraSPARCs versus desktop AMD >>based machines. Sun's AMD machines are twice as fast as their UItraSPARCs, >>for approximately the same price. What a hoot. The focus should not just be on SPARC vs AMD64. The AMD64 chips outperform Intel P4 and Xeon handily as well, using ooomph per dollar, oooomph per Megahertz, or most other measures. I'm certainly not complaining, it just appears AMD64 is an outstanding value these days. We purchased 2 laptops, one P4, one AMD64 from a linux-friendly vendor to use as software demo boxes. The AMD CPU speed is about 60% of the Intel P4 CPU speed, both have same amount of RAM & Disk, both have the same video controller. The intel laptop was more expensive, but the AMD64 box clearly outperforms it with both postgresql and our weather/flight tracking applications. Josh
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: