Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents
От | Chris Travers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42688243.4070006@travelamericas.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Hi Bruce; Ordinarily I would agree with you. I think it is way too easy for open source communities or other work communities to politicize themselves and this carries with it the risk of alienating members and potential members. If this was being asked before the ARC issue, I would be backing your side more or less completely. Also note that Joshua Drake used to oppose the idea as well. I can't speak for Mr. Drake, though he has stated that he has a commercial interest in such text because of recent experiences. I don't doubt that other businesses do as well. My business does for the simple reason that I can't afford to do a patent search on every algorythm I use in every program I write. With all due respect to Command Prompt, I do not find this reasoning compelling for the community. As companies we have to take a stand on this. Just because we do, this does not imply that we must make this a part of the community. Indeed doing so can cause more harm than good if we become "just another propaganda arm" of some other organization from the viewpoint of the newcommer. However, we are not just another open source project without any first-hand experience on this issue. We are, I hope, not merely talking about rehashing the advocacy writings of the EFF and others. We have first hand experience which can be valuable if shared. We have something unique to say about this issue as a community based on recent experience. We have taken a stand on this list and others by saying we don't even want to ask IBM for permission to use their patents. So like it or not, we already have a community position which is largely, if not a matter of concensus, a matter which cannot be dismissed. It is too late to ask whether we should take a stand on this issue as a community. I have said I support the idea but am concerned about details. I would like to see a unique button (not one copied from another organization's site), a unique page on PostgreSQL detailing our experience with this issue, and, provided that we do link to other organizations, provide a disclaimer that indicates that we do not feel that they speak for us. I even wonder if it is better to have the button say something neutral like "Patents and PostgreSQL" or "Patents and Open Source." Maybe even "Learn about Software Patents." Something that does not say what our position is before they read it. Then it is mostly discussing our experience with the issue rather than a political rant. Best Wishes, Chris Travers Metatron Technology Consulting
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: