Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4267D9D7.1010500@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Simply put, MD5 is no longer strong enough for protecting secrets. It's > just too easy to brute-force. SHA1 is ok for now, but it's days are > numbered as well. I think it would be good to alter SHA1 (or something > stronger) as an alternative to MD5, and I see no reason not to use a > random salt instead of username. If you aren't paying close enough attention to your database server to see that someone is trying to brute force your MD5 password you have bigger problems. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: