Re: Help installing 8.0.2 rpms on RH 3.0
От | Chris Hoover |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Help installing 8.0.2 rpms on RH 3.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 425D6032.6000703@sermonaudio.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Help installing 8.0.2 rpms on RH 3.0 ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Help installing 8.0.2 rpms on RH 3.0
Re: Help installing 8.0.2 rpms on RH 3.0 |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> Here is what I have: >> Virgin install of RH ES 3.0 from cd's (no update run right now) >> >> When I try to start installing the Postgresql rpms, I get the following: >> [root@localhost postgresql_rpms]# rpm -Uvh >> postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm >> warning: postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm: V3 DSA signature: >> NOKEY, key ID 748f7d0e >> error: Failed dependencies: >> libecpg.so.4 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG >> libpgtypes.so.1 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG >> libpq.so.3 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG >> Suggested resolutions: >> rh-postgresql-libs-7.3.4-8.i386.rpm > > > It looks like you already have postgresql installed via RH 3. You need > to remove it first, then install 8. > > Honestly, when working with the RH ES version it is better to compile > anyway. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > > > > I have checked, and postgresql is not installed on the system. Are there some dependent rpms that the postgresql-lib rpm needs? Why do you say it is better to compile (besides getting a "customized" postgresql)? Are there major problems with the rpm builds? Our management team really wants us to get away from compiling Postgresql if at all possible. So, I am going to need a very good argument to keep compiling Postgresql when we do this next project. Thanks, Chris
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: