Re: speed of querry?
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: speed of querry? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 425D573B.3080208@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | speed of querry? ("Joel Fradkin" <jfradkin@wazagua.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: speed of querry?
Re: speed of querry? |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Joel Fradkin wrote: > I must be missing something important, because I am just not seeing why this > query is slower on a 4 processor 8 gig machine running redhat AS4. Well, the 4 processors aren't going to help with a single query. However, assuming the configurations for both machines are comparable, you shouldn't be seeing a doubling in query-time. I have, however, spotted something very strange towards the bottom of each explain: > Machine 1 my desktop: > " -> Merge Right Join (cost=0.00..52366.50 rows=190710 width=75) > (actual time=16.000..1973.000 rows=177041 loops=1)" > " Merge Cond: ((("outer".clientnum)::text = > ("inner".clientnum)::text) AND ("outer".id = "inner".jobtitleid))" > Test Linux machine: > " -> Merge Right Join (cost=24825.80..27512.71 rows=176015 > width=75) (actual time=8743.848..9750.775 rows=177041 loops=1)" > " Merge Cond: ((("outer".clientnum)::text = > "inner"."?column10?") AND ("outer".id = "inner".jobtitleid))" In the first, we match outer.clientnum to inner.clientnum, in the second it's "?column10?" - are you sure the query was identical in each case. I'm guessing the unidentified column in query 2 is the reason for the sort a couple of lines below it, which seems to take up a large chunk of time. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: