Re: close-but-not-quite w/ pgadmin3.app on osx
От | Florian G. Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: close-but-not-quite w/ pgadmin3.app on osx |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 425A6AF8.2020407@phlo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: close-but-not-quite w/ pgadmin3.app on osx 10.3.8 ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: close-but-not-quite w/ pgadmin3.app on osx 10.3.8
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: >>Heres the problem - the executable should be named PgAdminIII, not > > > Don't mess with the branding!! :-) > > Can that be made 'pgAdmin3' please? The long form is 'pgAdmin III', with > the space. Never an uppercase P though. Well, the executable inside the bundle is practically invisble to the user anway, so I guess you want the whole bundle to be renamed... (I don't know if it's possible to name the main executable different than the bundle - I guess you can do it by specifying the executable name in the plist file, but there is not much point in this, since the executable name is hidden from the user anyway ;-) ). I can do that, but first I'd like to know if the current patch + my addition from today makes things work for OpenMacNews. If this works, I'll prepare a new Version of the patch with the bundle renamed. If not, I'd like to fix all remaining problems before introducing new breakage by renaming things... Which name do you prefer? I'd prefer "pgAdmin III", since it just looks prettier - but if the space in the bundle name causes problems, I'll go with pgAdmin3, if there are no objections. greetings, Florian Pflug
Вложения
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: