Re: DELETE ... USING
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DELETE ... USING |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42521009.5080600@samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DELETE ... USING (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: DELETE ... USING
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > ... but when it is TRUE, there should be a notice, same as there is in > SELECT. UPDATE should produce such a notice too, IMHO. Probably we > omitted the message originally because there was no way to avoid it > in a DELETE, but now there will be. Well, my previous message described why I'm not sure that this line of reasoning is correct. I think the only really proper configuration is add_missing_from=false and an explicit USING/FROM list. Just about the only reason to enable add_missing_from would be for compatibility with previous releases of PostgreSQL -- and that "compatible" behavior is not to issue a warning for UPDATE and DELETE in this situation. If the user deliberately enables add_missing_from, I'm inclined to trust them that they know what they're doing. -Neil
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: