Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 424EBB4B.3000708@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? (Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote: > In the past couple of years a lot of stuff has been removed from the > core - even the ODBC driver (which is ways more important than, let's > say, PL/PHP) has been removed from the core - so why should a new PL > be integrated now if considerably more important components will > remain external? ODBC is a client side driver. It is not a server side driver. It does not require PostgreSQL to be installed. plPHP, plPerl, etc... all require PostgreSQL, they are a part of PostgreSQL whether in core or not. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Best regards, > > Hans > > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> >>> I'm not convinced that PLs are more tied to the core than say >>> OpenFTS, and if we can't maintain that kind of thing externally, >>> then this whole extension thing sounds like a failure to me. >> >> >> >> It's *possible* to do it. Whether it's a net savings of effort is >> questionable. For instance, I've had to hack plperl and plpgsql >> over the past couple days to support OUT parameters, and the only >> reason I didn't have to hack the other two standard PLs is that they >> are a few features shy of a load already. I'm pretty sure pl/r and >> pl/java will need changes to support this feature too. If they were in >> core CVS then I'd consider it part of my responsibility to fix 'em >> ... but they aren't, so it isn't my problem, so it falls on Joe and >> Thomas to get up to speed on what I've been doing and do likewise. >> Is that really a win? >> >> The point here is really that we keep finding reasons to, if not >> flat-out change the interface to PLs, at least expand their >> responsibilities. Not to push it too hard, but we still have only >> one PL with a validator procedure, which IIRC was your own addition >> to that API. How come they don't all have validators? >> >> regards, tom lane >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > > > -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: