Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 424EB85C.7020103@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
Список | pgsql-general |
pl-j ( the other java procedural language ) is definately interested in being in core. Dave Tom Lane wrote: >"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > > >>On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> >> >>>Are we interested in having plPHP in core? >>> >>> > > > >>Is there a reason why it can no longer operate as a standalone language >>out of pgfoundry, like pl/java and pl/perl? >> >> > >PLs are sufficiently tightly tied to the core that it's probably >easier to maintain them as part of our core CVS than otherwise. >(Ask Joe Conway about PL/R. Thomas Hallgren is probably not that >happy about maintaining pl/java out of core, either. And pl/perl >*is* in core.) > >I'm thinking that a pl/PHP is much more interesting for the long term >than, say, pl/tcl (mind you, I am a Tcl partisan from way back, but >I see that many people are not so enlightened). Barring any licensing >problems I think this is something to pursue. > > regards, tom lane > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org > > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: