Re: fine tuning for logging server
От | John Arbash Meinel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fine tuning for logging server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 424B5C6F.8090609@arbash-meinel.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fine tuning for logging server (Florin Andrei <florin@andrei.myip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: fine tuning for logging server
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Florin Andrei wrote: >On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:50 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote: > > > >>Function: Essentially a logging server. There are two applications (like >>syslog) on the same box that are logging to pgsql, each one to its own >>database. There are a few tables in one DB, and exactly one table in the >>other. >>Most of the time, the apps are just doing mindless INSERTs to the DB. >>Every now and then, an admin performs some SELECTs via a PHP interface. >> >> > >For performance reasons, i was thinking to keep the tables append-only, >and simply rotate them out every so often (daily?) and delete those >tables that are too old. Is that a good idea? > > > If you aren't doing updates, then I'm pretty sure the data stays packed pretty well. I don't know that you need daily rotations, but you certainly could consider some sort of rotation schedule. The biggest performance improvement, though, is probably to group inserts into transactions. I had an application (in a different db, but it should be relevant), where using a transaction changed the time from 6min -> 6 sec. It was just thrashing on all the little inserts that it had to fsync to disk. How fast is fast? How many log messages are you expecting? 1/s 100/s 1000/s? I think the hardware should be capable of the 10-100 range if things are properly configured. Naturally that depends on all sorts of factors, but it should give you an idea. John =:->
Вложения
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: