Re: Alternative to psql -c ?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Alternative to psql -c ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42493.1403805729@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Alternative to psql -c ? (James Le Cuirot <chewi@aura-online.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Alternative to psql -c ?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
James Le Cuirot <chewi@aura-online.co.uk> writes: > This got me wondering what Rails uses. I dug into ActiveRecord and > found that apart from the odd call to PQexec with hardcoded single > statements, it uses PQsendQuery. The libpq docs state a few of the > differences but don't mention whether PQsendQuery automatically creates > a transaction like PQexec does. Please could you clarify this? PG is not capable of executing queries that are not in transactions, so yes, PQsendQuery will create a single-statement transaction if you haven't sent BEGIN. However, there's a huge difference for the purposes we're discussing here: PQsendQuery does not allow more than one SQL command in the string. So most of this discussion is irrelevant when you're going through that API. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: