Re: writing backend extensions using Visual
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: writing backend extensions using Visual |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42458CF7.2050606@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio (Greg Landrum <greg.landrum@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio
Re: writing backend extensions using Visual |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Greg Landrum wrote: >On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:57:07 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > >>Greg Landrum <greg.landrum@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >>>After playing around for a while, I managed to get a DLL to build and >>>work at least far enough that I can CREATE and call the functions from >>>psql. However, it looks like every argument I pass into the functions >>>comes in as null (e.g. PG_ARGISNULL returns true). This clearly is >>>less than helpful. :-) >>> >>> >>Sounds like MSVC is interpreting the layout of the FunctionCallInfo >>struct differently than the MinGW compiler did. You should probably >>look into whether there are "pragma pack" directives lurking in your >>program. ("pragma pack" is evil...) >> >> > >I've got the library stripped down to the bare minimum (just a couple >of demo functions) and I can't seem to find any uses of pragma pack, >so I don't think that's it. > > > > Do we actually support building backend extensions with anything other than our standard build environment? I know we support building libpq using MSVC, but that is for client use. I'm not even mildly surprised that building a backend extension with MSVC breaks. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: