Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 423ff64d88c6817551ea81e0b554202992184bac.camel@j-davis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 16:02 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > We're talking about benchmarking tools What I had in mind was something much less formal, like a self- contained repro case of a performance problem. ... simple schema ... data load ... maybe build some indexes ... maybe set hints VACUUM ANALYZE; CHECKPOINT; I'm not saying it's a very strong use case, but at least for me, it's kind of a habit to throw in a CHECKPOINT after a quick data load for a test, even if it might not matter for whatever I'm testing. I guess I can change my habit to use a function instead, but then what's the point of the syntax? Should we just add a builtin function pg_checkpoint(), and deprecate the syntax? Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: