Re: Performance problem on delete from for 10k rows. May
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance problem on delete from for 10k rows. May |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4238492B.2000801@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance problem on delete from for 10k rows. May (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Really? Postgres is generating these queries ??? Dave Alvaro Herrera wrote: >On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:18:39AM -0500, David Gagnon wrote: > >David, > > > >>I rerun the example with the debug info turned on in postgresl. As you >>can see all dependent tables (that as foreign key on table IC) are >>emptied before the DELETE FROM IC statement is issued. For what I >>understand the performance problem seem to came from those selects that >>point back to IC ( LOG: statement: SELECT 1 FROM ONLY "public"."ic" x >>WHERE "icnum" = $1 FOR UPDATE OF x). There are 6 of them. I don't know >>where they are comming from. >> >> > >I think they come from the FK checking code. Try to run a VACUUM on the >IC table just before you delete from the other tables; that should make >the checking almost instantaneous (assuming the vacuuming actually >empties the table, which would depend on other transactions). > >It would be better to be able to use TRUNCATE to do this, but in 8.0 you >can't if the tables have FKs. 8.1 is better on that regard ... > > > -- Dave Cramer http://www.postgresintl.com 519 939 0336 ICQ#14675561
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: