Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql
От | Robin Ericsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4236E656.4080100@localhost.nu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql (Mark Rae <mrae@purplebat.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Mark Rae wrote: > I would say that doing the concurrency tests is probably the most > important factor in comparing other databases against MySQL, as > MySQL will almost always win in single-user tests. > > E.g. here are some performance figures from tests I have done in the past. > This is with a 6GB databse on a 4CPU Itanium system running a mixture of > read-only queries, but it is fairly typical of the behaviour I have seen. > The Oracle figures also scaled in a similar way to postgres. > > Clients 1 2 3 4 6 8 12 16 32 64 128 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > mysql-4.1.1 1.00 1.41 1.34 1.16 0.93 1.03 1.01 1.00 0.94 0.86 0.80 > pg-7.4.1 0.65 1.27 1.90 2.48 2.45 2.50 2.48 2.51 2.49 2.39 2.38 Would be interesting to know about the tuning of the MySQL, I guess that buffers for indexing and sort is well setup, but what about thread caching? Knowing that will once in a while you will have a connection burst you can tell mysql to cache thread so that it can save time next time it needs them. -- Robin Ericsson http://robin.vill.ha.kuddkrig.nu/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: