Re: signed short fd
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: signed short fd |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4235FC7C.3040409@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: signed short fd (pgsql@mohawksoft.com) |
Ответы |
Re: signed short fd
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
pgsql@mohawksoft.com wrote: >>pgsql@mohawksoft.com writes: >> >> >>>That is hardly anything that I would feel comfortable with. Lets break >>>this down into all the areas that are ambiguous: >>> >>> >>There isn't anything ambiguous about this, nor is it credible that there >>are implementations that don't follow the intent of the spec. >> >> > >How do you know the intent of the spec? I have seen no meta discussion >about the behavior of the file descriptor integer returned from open. The >Steven's book makes no such assumptions, and the steven's book (Advanced >Programming in the UNIX Environment) is what people reference. > > > > > My copy of APUE says on page 49: "The file descriptor returned by open is the lowest numbered unused descriptor. This is used by some applications to open a new file on standard input, standard output, or standard error." Unless someone can show there's an actual problem this discussion seems quite pointless. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: