Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 422FC65A.5060806@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY (Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>Comments? Can anyone confirm whether DB2 or other databases allow >>ungrouped column references with HAVING? > > Oracle does not allow such references. It issues "ORA-00979: not a > GROUP BY expression" when you try to hand it such a reference. > > MS SQL Server does not allow such references either, yielding > "columnname is invalid in the HAVING clause because it is not > contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause.". > > Can't comment about DB2. MySQL allows it: mysql> create table tab (col integer); Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec) mysql> select col from tab having 2 > 1; Empty set (0.00 sec) mysql> insert into tab values (1); Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) mysql> select col from tab having 2 > 1; +------+ | col | +------+ | 1 | +------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) Of course, that's not saying much! Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: