Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 422F5E8A.5040202@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? ("Keith C. Perry" <netadmin@vcsn.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only?
Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? |
Список | pgsql-general |
> > >The only additional thing I would add to this if it hasn't been mentioned >already is that 2000 had/has some major security issues and even though 2003 is >more secure out of the box from what I've experienced so far, I would **never** >trust a windows box to anything other than my LAN using private IP blocks and if >it has inbound access via a public IP then it would more certainly be behind >another firewall that is NAT'ing/Port Forwarding its traffic. > > Nobody should ever put a server regardless of OS on a public IP. It should always be firewalled/Nat/Port Forwarding. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: