Re: pgpool question
От | Jeff Hoffmann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgpool question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 422F3111.7090504@propertykey.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgpool question (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgpool question
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Oleg Bartunov wrote: > I'm experimenting with pgpool 2.51 on my Linux box runnung > two postgresql backends: pg74:5432 and pg801:5433 > > I configured pgpool to use pg74:5432 as primary backend and pg801:5433 > as second one. Pgpool is running on default port (9999) and > I configured my web application to use it, so I could start/stop backends > without disturbing client (web browser). > > When I stop primary backend (pg74:5432) pgpool switched to backend > failover from (5432) to (5433) done > but when I start primary and stopped secondary backend pgpool > never switched back to primary backend as expected ! I see bogus message > like: > starting failover from (5433) to (5433) > > What I'm doing wrong ? I don't think anything. I could be wrong, but my understanding is that if the primary goes down, you have to restart pgpool after primary comes back up. It doesn't toggle back and forth from primary <-> secondary when necessary, it only goes primary->secondary. I played with pgpool for a while and came up with effectively the same confused question. -- Jeff Hoffmann jeff@propertykey.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: