Re: pg primary key bug?
От | Markus Schaber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg primary key bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 421B3550.5080108@logi-track.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg primary key bug? (Ragnar Hafstað <gnari@simnet.is>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Hi, Ragnar, Ragnar Hafstað schrieb: >>We are using jdbc (jdbc driver from pg) + jboss (java based >>application server) + connection pool (biult in jboss). >>... >>Will vacuum full generate this problem if we have locked table in this >>time? (It is possible to have locked table in theory) > I do not know if this is relevant, but I have seen jboss applications > keep sessions in 'Idle in transaction' state, apparently with some > locks granted. Would such cases not interfere with vacuum? Most of those "Idle in transaction" problems were caused by suboptimal handling of BEGIN in the pgjdbc driver, this should be fixed in current versions of postgres.jar (build 8.0-310). Markus -- markus schaber | dipl. informatiker logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53 mailto:schabios@logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: