Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 11. Februar 2005 13:37 schrieb Marques Johansson:
>
>>A recent Slashdot thread on MySQL performance
>>(http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/11/038232&from=rss)
>>contains a comment mentioning the following Fermilab report from May 2003:
>
>
> They were apparently testing with PostgreSQL 6.3 at best, so I'd disregard
> this report.
>

Perhaps someone from advocacy could go through their list of issues
and help them. They do seem to be trying to update it, and now
have references to newer features: "Datafile location and a
tablespace implementation as of version 8."


However some of their criteria (savepoints:"no", incremental
online backups:"no", and "access to multiple databases: no"
(what about dblink)) still seem incorrect.


Fermilab did have contact information ("mail comments to:") at the
bottom of the page.  Fermilab's a quite highly respected organization,
so I think this page is probably trusted by many.