Re: Benchmark
От | Ron Mayer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Benchmark |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 420F1C00.7030808@cheapcomplexdevices.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Benchmark (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote: > Great Bridge did essentially that years ago, but I think we only got > away with it because we didn't say which DBs "Commercial Database A" > and "Commercial Database B" actually were. Even off the record, we > were only allowed to tell people that the commercial DBs were Oracle > and SQL Server ... but not which was which. IMHO clues like: "What versions of the databases did you use? - PostgreSQL - 7.0 release version - Proprietary 1 - 8.1.5 - Proprietary 2 - 7.0 - MySQL - 3.22.32 - Interbase - 6.0 " and "PostgreSQL" and "Proprietary 1" was running "red hat linux 6.1" and "Proprietary 2" was running Windows NT server 4 - service pack 4" in articles like this one: http://www.xperts.com/news/press1.htm helped some people narrow it down a bit. :)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: