Re: PGConnection vs. Connection
От | Oliver Jowett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGConnection vs. Connection |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 420D1444.3060806@opencloud.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PGConnection vs. Connection (Markus Schaber <schabios@logi-track.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGConnection vs. Connection
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Markus Schaber wrote: > the addDataType() methods are carried by the > org.postgresql.Connection class instead of the > org.postgresql.PGConnection interface in 7.3 and up. That's unfortunate :( > - Prodiding a patch that is to be applied manually (rsp. by the debian > package build process) when building for 7.2. (this is our "current > practice"). That seems the simplest approach. Both the 7.2 driver and server are truely ancient now -- I think having to manually apply a patch if you want to run against them isn't unreasonable. > - Using reflection. This could allow us per run-time distinction to use > o.p.PGConnection.addDataType(Class) when running against pgjdbc 8.0, > o.p.PGConnection.addDataType(String) against 7.3/7.4, and > o.p.Connection.addDataType(String) against 7.2. This way we could ship > a single postgis.jar that runs against all pgjdbc versions. That seems the most flexible approach, but reflection can be a pain to deal with. For the packaging case, if you are going to build "PostGIS for 7.2" and "PostGIS for 8.0" as separate packages then there doesn't seem like much advantage to having a single PostGIS build/jar anyway. -O
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: