Re: vacuum confusion
От | John Sidney-Woollett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: vacuum confusion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 420CD9B9.2060803@wardbrook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: vacuum confusion (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks Tom, I figured it out after I saw the error message when trying to vacuum template0. I think the 7.4.x docs could do with a more explanation. The 8.0 docs are better although a more explicit explanation stating that you MUST vacuum analyze template1 (periodically) would be useful. Thanks John Sidney-Woollett Tom Lane wrote: > John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw@wardbrook.com> writes: > >>However the implication (and my confusion) is that you need to vacuum >>your own databases only. It's not clear (to me) that you have to do the >>same for template0 and template1 as well. > > > You have to vacuum template1, but not template0 because the latter is > marked not datallowconn. Not sure if this is adequately explained > anywhere. The next-to-last para in section 21.1.3 does mention the > datallowconn exception, but perhaps doesn't spell it out well enough. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: