Re: vacuum confusion
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: vacuum confusion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 420C82A2.8090201@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: vacuum confusion (John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw@wardbrook.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: vacuum confusion
Re: vacuum confusion |
Список | pgsql-general |
John Sidney-Woollett wrote: > Ah.., no we're not vacuuming template0 or 1. > > I didn't realise that the transaction ID would be stored here - I > assumed that they'd be in our database. > > Do I need to need to (plain) vacuum, or vacuum full these template0 and > template1? And is this something that can be done once a week rather > than every night (like our main database)? Ah! Found the section of the manuals - see "Routine Database Maintenance Tasks" for details. AFAIK it's a simple vacuum and once a week is more than enough. The manual recommends once every 500million transactions, though you can leave it longer. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: