pg_dump bug in 7.3.9 with sequences
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | pg_dump bug in 7.3.9 with sequences |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42013187.7040806@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump bug in 7.3.9 with sequences
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, Ran into this little gem with a customer today: This works: create table foo (foo int not null, bar text); create sequence foo_seq; alter table foo alter column foo set default nextval('foo_seq'); pg_dump will correctly dump the table: CREATE TABLE foo ( foo integer DEFAULT nextval('foo_seq'::text) NOT NULL, bar text ); -- -- TOC entry 3 (OID 107565218) -- Name: foo_seq; Type: SEQUENCE; Schema: public; Owner: postgres -- CREATE SEQUENCE foo_seq START 1 INCREMENT 1 MAXVALUE 9223372036854775807 MINVALUE 1 CACHE 1; However if you do the following: create table foo (foo serial not null, bar text); create sequence foo_seq; alter table foo alter column foo set default nextval('foo_seq'); pg_dump will give you the following: CREATE TABLE foo ( foo serial NOT NULL, bar text ); -- -- TOC entry 3 (OID 107566148) -- Name: foo_seq; Type: SEQUENCE; Schema: public; Owner: postgres -- CREATE SEQUENCE foo_seq START 1 INCREMENT 1 MAXVALUE 9223372036854775807 MINVALUE 1 CACHE 1; Which is wrong because we want the column foo to use a default of foo_seq not foo_foo_seq. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: