Re: CLUSTER and MVCC
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CLUSTER and MVCC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 420.1173458189@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CLUSTER and MVCC (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CLUSTER and MVCC
Re: CLUSTER and MVCC Re: CLUSTER and MVCC |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes: > We wouldn't clean up tuples that are visible to a transaction, but if > you have one long-running transaction like pg_dump in a database with > otherwise short transaction, you'll have a lot of tuples that are not > vacuumable because of the long-running process, but are not in fact > visible to any transaction. It sounds to me like you are proposing to remove the middles of update chains, which would break READ-COMMITTED updates initiated by the older transactions. Now admittedly pg_dump isn't going to issue any such updates, but VACUUM doesn't know that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: