Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error
От | Laurenz Albe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41d84eb3471bd6f42384f054c04573ad5c8d7aac.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > [ redirecting to pgsql-docs list ] > > I wrote: > > Federico <cfederico87@gmail.com> writes: > > > I did not come across that documented behavior while searching for regclass > > > in the pg docs. The most relevant page I was able to find was the Object > > > Identifier Types page that does not mention it. > > > I'll look into proposing a change in that docs page to mention it, if > > > that's the appropriate location for it. > > Hmm ... I *thought* it was documented, but perhaps not. If not, > > it's likely that the other reg* types are likewise underdocumented. > > So what I was remembering was some text in the section about sequence > functions. That probably seemed appropriate when they were the only > real use of regclass; but these days we have regclass-accepting functions > all over, not to mention other OID alias types. I propose the attached > patch to move this info into the "Object Identifier Types" section. That patch looks good to me. I think it is an improvement to have that discussed under "data types". Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: