Re: Concurrent free-lock
От | Jonah H. Harris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Concurrent free-lock |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41F589B2.1050904@tvi.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Concurrent free-lock (Pailloncy Jean-Gerard <jg@rilk.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Concurrent free-lock
Re: Concurrent free-lock |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Neil, Here is some pretty good info on lock-free structures... I'm pretty sure I tested their code in a multithreaded high-concurrency environment and experienced the problems I was discussing. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/lock-free/ Neil Conway wrote: >On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 08:35 -0700, Jonah H. Harris wrote: > > >>Lock free data structures are cool... but not really applicable to >>databases. They have a high maintenance overhead, severe complexity, >>and will fail when there are many concurrent inserts/deletes to the >>structure. >> >> > >Can you elaborate on when they would fail, and why? > >It might be worth considering lock-free data structures for certain >parts of the backend, but I'm skeptical they would be much of a win over >locking most of the time. > >-Neil > > > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: