Re: ARC patent
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ARC patent |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 41EC206F.1050801@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ARC patent (Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ARC patent
Re: ARC patent |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>If PostgreSQL 8.0 is released with ARC, and then PostgreSQL 8.1 is >released without ARC, and then the patent is granted to IBM, would >everyone be fine if they just all switched to 8.1 at that time? Or would >we have some kind of retroactive problem? Would people that are still >using 8.0 in production, but not distributing it, have difficulty? > > The biggest problem is going to be that if we release 8 with the patented stuff, then for a minimum of 3 years there will be liability for anyone running 8. We still have people running 7.1 and once you get something into production you typically don't just "change" it. Basically I think the fact that we are even considering leaving the knowingly infringing code in 8 is presenting a horrible face to the community. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake >Regards, > Jeff > > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org > > -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: