Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41E2F43C.5020702@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft (Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud<lists@boutiquenumerique.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Список | pgsql-performance |
I'm curious, why do you think that's serious ? What do you really expect to do in the stored procedure ? Anything of consequence will seriously degrade performance if you select it in say a million rows. Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud wrote: >> The .NET Runtime will be a part of the next MS SQLServer engine. You >> will be able to have C# as a pl in the database engine with the next >> version of MSSQL. That certainly will be something to think about. > > > Ah, well, if it's C# (or even VB.NET) then it's serious ! > I thought postgres had pl/java ? > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > > -- Dave Cramer http://www.postgresintl.com 519 939 0336 ICQ#14675561
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: