Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Low Performance for big hospital server .. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41DD76E5.1090806@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Low Performance for big hospital server .. (Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Reading can be worse for a normalized db, which is likely what the developers were concerned about. One always have to be careful to measure the right thing. Dave Frank Wiles wrote: >On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:06:55 -0800 >Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > > >>I can't tell you how many times I've seen this sort of thing. And >>the developers always tell me "Well, we denormalized for performance >>reasons ... " >> >> > > Now that's rich. I don't think I've ever seen a database perform > worse after it was normalized. In fact, I can't even think of a > situation where it could! > > --------------------------------- > Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org> > http://www.wiles.org > --------------------------------- > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > > > > -- Dave Cramer http://www.postgresintl.com 519 939 0336 ICQ#14675561
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: