Re: Very Bad Performance.
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Very Bad Performance. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41D9D8C1.4090906@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Very Bad Performance. (Pallav Kalva <pkalva@deg.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: Very Bad Performance.
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Well, it's not quite that simple the rule of thumb is 6-10% of available memory before postgres loads is allocated to shared_buffers. then effective cache is set to the SUM of shared_buffers + kernel buffers Then you have to look at individual slow queries to determine why they are slow, fortunately you are running 7.4 so you can set log_min_duration to some number like 1000ms and then try to analyze why those queries are slow. Also hyperthreading may not be helping you.. Dave Pallav Kalva wrote: > Hi , > > I am experiencing a very bad performance on my production database > lately , all my queries are slowing down. Our application is a > webbased system with lot of selects and updates. I am running > "vacuumdb" daily on all the databases, are the below postgres > configuration parameters are set properly ? can anyone take a look. > Let me know if you need anymore information. > > > Postgres Version: 7.4 > Operating System: Linux Red Hat 9 > Cpus: 2 Hyperthreaded > RAM: 4 gb > Postgres Settings: > max_fsm_pages | 20000 > max_fsm_relations | 1000 > shared_buffers | 65536 > sort_mem | 16384 > vacuum_mem | 32768 > wal_buffers | 64 > effective_cache_size | 393216 > > Thanks! > Pallav > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > > -- Dave Cramer http://www.postgresintl.com 519 939 0336 ICQ#14675561
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: