Re: What HW / OS is recommeded
От | Geoffrey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What HW / OS is recommeded |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41CA1769.2030500@3times25.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What HW / OS is recommeded (Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Lonni J Friedman wrote: > On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:28:22 -0500, Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>"a" == alex <alex@meerkatsoft.com> writes: >> >>a> We are currently looking at Dell / HP >>a> but the questions is >> >>a> - how many processors (2 or 4) >>a> - do we gain with 4 cpus if we probably never have a few users connected >>a> - what processors are recommended Opteron / Xeon / Itanium >>a> - how much memory ? 2GB ? 4GB ? >>a> - Disks, i guess we go with Raid5, 15k SCSI >>a> - what OS ? Suse / RHE3 / Fedora / >>a> - Disk controller ? >> >>Run, do not walk, from your Dell solution. I've never been able to >>get "expected" performance from those boxes. They seem to do >>something to the RAID controllers to make them not work as fast as one >>would expect the equivalent name-brand part (eg, LSI RAID card or >>Adaptec RAID card) and similar disk drives. > > > Hate to burst your bubble, but the RAID controller that Dell ships is > an Adaptec OEM. Dell just rebrands them. Dell is known for having their own 'version' of hardware made, specifically to reduce the cost of the machines. I don't know that this is the case with this adapter, but I would not ever purchase another dell machine. -- Until later, Geoffrey
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: