Re: production server down
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: production server down |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41C0B938.9030006@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: production server down (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark wrote: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >>I've always felt that running a database across NFS was a Bad Idea ;-) > > Well not that I disagree with that sentiment, but NFS was specifically > designed to handle this particular scenario. *UNLESS* you use the "soft" > option. As popular as it is, this is precisely the scenario where it causes > problems. > > (The "intr" option as well, but I don't think that would be relevant for > postgres). I checked; doesn't seem to be an issue: # cat /etc/fstab csddata7-vlan35:/vol/vol0/replica /replica nfs proto=tcp,suid,rw,vers=3,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,hard,fg,rsize=8192,wsize=8192 0 0 I'd be interested in any feedback on the settings. The connection between server and NetApp is on a private vlan on a separate network interface than the rest of the LAN. I'm not positive, but I think we have jumbo frames (9K) enabled on that interface ... looks like we do: # ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:09:6B:E6:33:B7 [...] UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:9000 Metric:1 Thanks, Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: